Page 4 of 4

Re: Chattanooga

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 5:22 pm
by woffordgrad94
chattanoogamocs wrote:Re: Chattanooga

Postby woffordgrad94 on Sat Nov 12, 2016 7:03 pm
The refs tried to take away our victory but they failed. Chatty has become the SoCon's "darling"


Dang, I wish. When the Mocs played VMI a couple of weeks ago, they were called for 1 false start for 5 yards, the Mocs got called for 12 penalties for 84 yards.

If that is being the SoCon's darling, I would rather be it's ugly stepchild.

You''ll have to excuse me as I sometimes ger carried away. I know there's no referee bias. The SoCon refs are just plain bad for everybody.

Re: Chattanooga

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 5:50 pm
by crabbyterrier
chattanoogamocs wrote:Just wanted to drop by and congratulate the Terriers on a well played game. Wofford played better than the Mocs, end of story. Y'all deserved the W.


Thanks for the congrats! It was a hard fought game!

Go TERRIERS!!!

Re: Chattanooga

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 7:41 pm
by walliver
woffordgrad94 wrote:
chattanoogamocs wrote:Re: Chattanooga

Postby woffordgrad94 on Sat Nov 12, 2016 7:03 pm
The refs tried to take away our victory but they failed. Chatty has become the SoCon's "darling"


Dang, I wish. When the Mocs played VMI a couple of weeks ago, they were called for 1 false start for 5 yards, the Mocs got called for 12 penalties for 84 yards.

If that is being the SoCon's darling, I would rather be it's ugly stepchild.

You''ll have to excuse me as I sometimes ger carried away. I know there's no referee bias. The SoCon refs are just plain bad for everybody.

I've always believed that. Even when we were in the NAIA, they were consistently bad.

ACC refs are different. They have protected Clemson all year. (and I pull for the Tiggers over the Chickens.)